… AG’s response is due by 10/30.
My brief was not impressive- I’m tired. It’s devoid of “legalesse” and filled with typos – the result of cynicism and a lack of sleep on the day it was due. Does that even matter? If it had been perfectly composed, would it on that account have been persuasive? Does a man who is 100% correct lose his rights because he lacks an editor and goofed a few times typing up his brief at the last minute? Am I to be blamed for my small willingness to invest time and effort at perfecting a brief that I’ve already written 4+ times before and every time rejected by the California Courts? I think the opposite at this point. Good that’s it’s rough and uncouth and filled with obvious typos – that will give the idiot judges as many opportunities as possible to cuckold-out and reject it for spurious reasons that have no substance. After all, …
why should I make it easy for them to exoneration themselves?
Why is the California Department of Corrections having so much trouble figuring out how to kill criminals who’ve been sentenced to death ? It’s because Jewish communists are trying to hyper-regulate lethal injection protocol to frustrate the state’s ability to put anyone to death.
This is the law at issue:
CA Penal Code § 3604 (a) “The punishment of death shall be inflicted by the administration of a lethal gas or by an intravenous injection of a substance or substances in a lethal quantity sufficient to cause death, by standards established under the direction of the Department of Corrections.”
Allegedly pumping lethal drugs into prisoners is simply a task way too complicated to figure out properly.
Here’s an easy solution:
“substance” = Plumbum, commonly known as “lead” – in capsule form (i.e., as bullets and/or shotgun pellets)
“intravenous injection” = propelling the aforementioned lead capsules at rapid rate of speed into the posterior cerebral arteries (i.e., shot into the back of the murder’s head execution style).
“Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.” Ecclesiastes 8:11
“And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man. 6 Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.” Genesis 9:5-6
I filed my appeal of the dismissal in January and here it is 6 months later and LA court’s “appeals unit” still hasn’t completed the official record to send to the appeals court. Until they do that my appeal remains stalled. (The staff there has been incredibly rude and I have to wonder whether they’ve tagged my case to get “special treatment”.)
New initiative deadlines are coming for the 2018 general election starting very soon:
August 22, 2017 – Suggested last day for proponent(s) to submit proposed measure to the Attorney General and request a circulating title and summary.
October 26, 2017 – Attorney General prepares and issues the circulating title and summary (includes time allotted for fiscal estimate); proponent(s) may begin circulation of the petition.
April 24, 2018 – Last day for proponent(s) to file the petition with county elections officials.
May 4, 2018 – Last day for county elections officials to complete raw count totals and certify raw numbers to the Secretary of State.
Looks like I am forced to seek a federal court order allowing the “Sodomite Suppression” initiative to proceed for 2018 because waiting for the state court system is way too slow — I will miss yet another election cycle.
Update: Got notice on 8/11/2017 that Appeals Court is finally ready for my opening brief – even though they still haven’t sent me a copy of the record. Brief deadline is 9/20/2017.